Science of People

The best research on human behavior, relationships and personal development for easy use in real life.

Lance Armstrong’s Body Language with Oprah: Defiance, Not Regret

Posted by Vanessa Van Edwards on January 18, 2013 | 3 Comments

We were all shocked to find out that Lance Armstrong had been involved with illegal substances throughout his seven Tour De France wins. His interview with Oprah, sadly, showed more anger, pride and defiance than sadness and regret.

Overall, he did show some nerves, but very little sadness—which is the emotion he should have been feeling if he was truly sorry for his cheating and lying. He also showed anger at the accusations, contempt at the questions, and defiance, which leads me to believe that he still thinks his actions were justified.

Let’s look at Lance Armstrong’s specific body language and microexpressions throughout his first interview with Oprah to see what he was really feeling.

1. The Confession:

2 smile

As Armstrong answers Oprah’s direct questions about taking banned substances, there is a distinct lack of sadness (see my guide to the sadness microexpression). In fact, the first real microexpression we see is when Oprah asks Armstrong “Did you ever take the banned substance EPO?” He answers and then narrows his eyes in anger—a small leak to his true feelings.

3 contempt

 

Oprah then asks him if he believes you need banned substances to win the Tour De France. He says yes and then smiles. This is a clear explanation about why he was angry at the EPO question–he believes you need to dope to win. Immediately following the smile, he shows contempt. Again, he is irritated that he is being asked these questions.

Not only are sadness and sorrow missing through-out the interview. His body actually shows dominance. For example, he is seated in the open leg cross. This is the position Western cowboys sat in–it signifies confidence and aggressiveness. It also takes up more physical space than sitting in a neutral position or a closed cross, which is a way to claim territory. 4 cowboy cross

Another prideful gesture is when Armstrong refers to himself in a traditional ‘chest pound’ which only confident, alpha males do. If he felt bad for his actions, he would not be showing such dominant behavior.

 2. Why Now?

Oprah asks Armstrong about why he has been telling lies up until now. Armstrong says, “This story was so perfect for so long.” And then shows a small smile, which is also known as duping delight. It pleases him that he got away with the story for so long and he liked it when it was perfect–of course, he was doping, winning and getting away with it.

6 petting3. Doping Scheme

When Oprah asks Armstrong, “How did it all work?” He pets and scratches his head for longer than needed. This is one of his few signs of nerves. Petting or scratching the head is a nervous and self-soothing gesture. Like a parent pats a child’s head before bed, we do this to calm ourselves down. I think he was nervous about answering this question–whether because he is ashamed or still hiding something, I think is answered a little later in the interview.

I do not believe that Armstrong feels remorse or guilt for his doping. Not only does he say in the beginning that he believes you need the drugs to win, but when he says to Oprah, “My cocktail was only…” Using the word only implies he still does not think that what he did was that bad. He also flat out says he justifies taking testosterone because of his cancer.

The final evidence for Armstrong’s lack of remorse is when he is explaining the ‘generation of doping’ and says, “I didn’t create it, but I didn’t stop it. And that’s what I have to feel sorry for,” and then does a one sided shoulder shrug–one of the most typical body language leaks of liars. I do not believe he feels sorry at all.

4. Anger and Holding Back

Through out the interview Armstrong purses his lips together and raises his chin. This has a double meaning, first pursing your lips usually means you are withholding information. Since I beleive Armstrong feels justified in his actions, I believe he is holding back all of his justifications for what he did. And the chin raise is part of the microexpression for anger. (see my guide to microexpressions)I think he is angry that he has been caught and having to answer the questions.

5. Suing Shame

Screen Shot 2013-01-18 at 3.01.06 PM

The one time I think Armstrong shows shame is when he is talking about suing people who he knew were telling the truth. Not only does he touch his face much more during this segment–a self comforting gesture we do when we are nervous. But he also uses distancing language because I think he is ashamed. He says, “It’s a major flaw. It’s a guy who expected to get whatever he wanted and to control every outcome.” He refers to himself in the third person because I think he is ashamed he did it and wants to distance himself from those actions.

6. Contempt At Recklessness

Armstrong shows great contempt at his reckless period. Whether this is because he regrets his behavior, or because he regrets being reckless which led to him being caught–we can only guess. From other clues in the interview, I would say he is more regretful of being caught.

Lance Armstrong’s body language does not match his verbal content. I think his lies caught up to him and he is confessing and saying sorry because he has to. Stay tuned for my analysis of the Part II of the Oprah / Armstrong interview.

 

email

Posted in Brain Science, Conflict Science, Lie Detection, Personal Development, Relationships, Risky Behavior |

3 Responses to “Lance Armstrong’s Body Language with Oprah: Defiance, Not Regret”

  1. Robert says:

    I think he thinks this is all unreasonable because in his mind everyone was doping so he was competing on a fair playing field, and is restraining himself from pointing fingers and calling everyone out. I think he would love to make a point and through cycling as a sport under the bus, but for some reason is refraining for doing that. Maybe the cycling authorities made an under the table deal with him to not implicate others?

    Something is going on that the public is not privy too in regards to Lance spilling the beans on everyone and I look forward to all the details coming out eventually. I doubt we have seen the last of the deceit in the cycling world.

    • Vanessa Van Edwards says:

      Hi Robert,

      I totally agree with you. I think he is trying to cover something up and that is why he is not whistle blowing on everyone…im just not sure what and why. But he certainly wants to and think it is justified since ‘everyone dopes’ in his industry from what media reports have been saying.

      Best,

      V

  2. Ernest says:

    Very good analysis.

Leave a Reply